Home > Cases > Active Cases > Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County et al. v. County of...

Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County et al. v. County of Sonoma et al.

September 5, 2008

The ACLU-NC filed a lawsuit in September 2008 charging that the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department and the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have been collaborating beyond the law to target, arrest, and detain Latino residents of Sonoma County.

On July 31, 2009, Judge Hamilton granted in part and denied in part the motions to dismiss.

Constitutional Violations Charged

For three years sheriff deputies and ICE agents have stopped and searched people who appear to be Latino, interrogated them about their immigration status, and detained them in the county jail without lawful authority.

The lawsuit charges that the actions by the local sheriff and ICE violated constitutional guarantees of due process, equal protection, and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, and that the Sheriff’s Department acted beyond its authority in enforcing federal immigration law.

The ACLU-NC filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in San Francisco on behalf of three individuals who were unlawfully detained, as well as on behalf of the Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County, a local community organization.

California law does not permit local sheriffs and police to enforce immigration law. But in Sonoma County, deputy sheriffs have arrested people suspected of violating civil immigration law and placed them in county jail without a warrant or any criminal basis for arrest. 

The ACLU charges that once they are booked in county jail, arrestees in Sonoma are typically held for more than three days without being told what the charges are against them, provided with access to legal services, told that statements they make may be used against them in immigration proceedings, or notified that they have a right to a hearing, including a hearing to determine whether they may be released on bond.

Federal law requires such protections for people arrested on immigration violations without a warrant.

The suit is led by Julia Harumi Mass of the ACLU-NC with pro bono support by Latham & Watkins LLP.



LEGAL DOCUMENTS
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Dec. 16, 2009)
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Dec. 16, 2009)
County Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Oct. 29, 2009)
Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (Nov. 3, 2009)
Second Amended Complaint (Sep. 14, 2009)
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages (Sept. 5, 2008)
Order on MTDs and Discovery Motions (July 31, 2009)





RELATED ISSUES
Racial Justice

Clicky Web Analytics