![]() |
CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| Death Penalty | |
| Police Practices | |
![]() |
GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE |
![]() |
FREEDOM OF PRESS AND SPEECH |
![]() |
LGBT |
![]() |
PRIVACY |
![]() |
RELIGION |
![]() |
RACIAL JUSTICE |
![]() |
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS |
![]() |
TECHNOLOGY |
![]() |
YOUTH |

At the hearing, several other murder victim family members spoke, explaining their stories and their reasons for opposing the death penalty. Among other things, they said that the death penalty does nothing to heal their pain and that it only diverts resources from programs that could help them, as well as from solving and prosecuting other serious crimes.
These stories and perspectives are included in a new publication,Voices from California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. To learn more, visit: www.californiacrimevictims.org.
The California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice is preparing
for its third and final public hearing on California’s broken death penalty,
to be held March 28th at Santa Clara University. At hearings in January
and February, the Commission heard about other problems with California’s death
penalty, including racial and geographic disparities in death sentencing, the
lack of well qualified defense attorneys, and the lack of transparency and
accountability for local prosecutors. The Commission will hear evidence of
further problems at its final hearing. Visit www.ccfaj.org to learn more.


