Home > Issues > Criminal Justice > Death Penalty > Death by Geography: A County by County Analysi...

Death by Geography: A County by County Analysis of the Road to Execution


"Death by Geography" reviews the death-sentencing practices, public safety records, and spending practices of the 24 most populous California counties.  The report reveals that while the vast majority of California counties have largely abandoned execution in favor of simply sentencing people to die in prison, just 10 counties continue to aggressively pursue executions, accounting for nearly 85 percent of death sentences since 2000.

These counties have little else in common: Factors such as homicide rates, population densities, and voting patterns do not correlate with death sentencing.  All of the counties that continue to aggressively pursue death sentences share important qualities with neighboring counties that do not.  For instance:

• A resident of Alameda is eight times more likely to be sentenced to death than a resident of nearby Santa Clara;

• A person charged with murder is seven times more likely to be sentenced to execution if he or she lives in Tulare than if he or she lives in neighboring Fresno.

"Death by Geography" shows that California’s death penalty has become so arbitrary that the county border, not the facts of a case, now determines who is executed and who is simply sentenced to die from old age, illness or injury in the general prison population. 

By comparing active death penalty counties with low-death and non-death counties, "Death by Geography" also shows that the death penalty is unnecessary; it provides no benefit to the counties that continue to aggressively pursue death sentences and may even detract from other important community needs.  Comparison with non-death and low-death counties demonstrates that counties that sentence people to death do not experience lower homicide rates or higher rates of solving homicides.

"Death by Geography" outlines the true costs of the death penalty to each county that sends people to death row by calculating how those counties might otherwise have spent the money for public services.

Full Report
Executive Summary

Fact Sheets
County Death Sentences, 2000-2007
Alameda
Contra Costa
Kern
Los Angeles
Orange
Riverside
Sacramento
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Francisco
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Tulare
Ventura

See also: "The Hidden Death Tax: The Secret Costs of Seeking Execution in California"







ACCADP
California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
News Coverage

We All Pay for California's Death Penalty. Op Ed by Calif. State Senator Mark Leno (Marin Independent Journal, 1/13/2009)

Newark Police Chief Ray Samuels: Holding on to Death Penalty is Serious Mistake.
(Oakland Tribune, 12/22/2008)

Death Row Realism: Do Executions Make us Safer? San Quentin's Former Warden Says No
. (Los Angeles Times, 10/2/2008)

Death Penalty System Requires A Major Overhaul
 (San Jose Mercury News Editorial, 7/2/2008)

Report: California Death Penalty System Deeply Flawed,  (Associated Press, 7/1/2008)

Click Here for More >>

ACLU Death Penalty Litigation
Pacific News Service v. Woodford

California First Amendment Coalition (CFAC) v. Calderon

Multimedia

Watch a video of murder victim survivors and members of the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill who oppose the death penalty. View in full screen.

Listen to a Shared Values Podcast about why both secular and faith communities oppose the death penalty.

Listen to a Perspective by Darryl Stallworth, a Prosecutor for 15 Years Who Opposes the Death Penalty

View Exoneree Videos

Listen to an Exoneree Podcast

RELATED ISSUES
Death Penalty

Clicky Web Analytics