Home > Issues > Criminal Justice > Death Penalty > Death by Geography: A County by County Analysi...

Death by Geography: A County by County Analysis of the Road to Execution


"Death by Geography" reviews the death-sentencing practices, public safety records, and spending practices of the 24 most populous California counties.  The report reveals that while the vast majority of California counties have largely abandoned execution in favor of simply sentencing people to die in prison, just 10 counties continue to aggressively pursue executions, accounting for nearly 85 percent of death sentences since 2000.

These counties have little else in common: Factors such as homicide rates, population densities, and voting patterns do not correlate with death sentencing.  All of the counties that continue to aggressively pursue death sentences share important qualities with neighboring counties that do not.  For instance:

• A resident of Alameda is eight times more likely to be sentenced to death than a resident of nearby Santa Clara;

• A person charged with murder is seven times more likely to be sentenced to execution if he or she lives in Tulare than if he or she lives in neighboring Fresno.

"Death by Geography" shows that California’s death penalty has become so arbitrary that the county border, not the facts of a case, now determines who is executed and who is simply sentenced to die from old age, illness or injury in the general prison population. 

By comparing active death penalty counties with low-death and non-death counties, "Death by Geography" also shows that the death penalty is unnecessary; it provides no benefit to the counties that continue to aggressively pursue death sentences and may even detract from other important community needs.  Comparison with non-death and low-death counties demonstrates that counties that sentence people to death do not experience lower homicide rates or higher rates of solving homicides.

"Death by Geography" outlines the true costs of the death penalty to each county that sends people to death row by calculating how those counties might otherwise have spent the money for public services.

Full Report
Executive Summary

Fact Sheets
County Death Sentences, 2000-2007
Alameda
Contra Costa
Kern
Los Angeles
Orange
Riverside
Sacramento
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Francisco
San Mateo
Santa Barbara
Santa Clara
Tulare
Ventura

See also: "The Hidden Death Tax: The Secret Costs of Seeking Execution in California"







California Crime Victims for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
Faces of Wrongful Conviction
News Coverage

Death Penalty System Requires A Major Overhaul (San Jose Mercury News Editorial, 7/2/2008)

Death Penalty Deserves its Own Death (Visalisa Times-Delta Editorial, 7/2/2008)

Report: California Death Penalty System Deeply Flawed,  (Associated Press, 7/1/2008)

It's Official: California's Death Penalty is a Multi-Million Dollar Failure. Now What? (California Progress Report, 6/30/2008)

Click Here for More >>

Multimedia


Watch murder victims' families testify at the Jan. 10 hearing of the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice.

Listen to a Podcast About Wrongful Conviction and Fast-Tracking Death Penalty Appeals

Listen to an Exoneree Podcast

View Videos of Exonerees
RELATED ISSUES
Death Penalty