![]() |
CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
![]() |
GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE |
![]() |
FREEDOM OF PRESS AND SPEECH |
![]() |
IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS |
![]() |
LGBT |
![]() |
PRIVACY |
![]() |
RELIGION |
![]() |
RACIAL JUSTICE |
![]() |
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS |
![]() |
TECHNOLOGY |
![]() |
YOUTH |




The California Constitution explicitly protects reproductive privacy, making the state a relative safe haven for women who make the difficult choice to end a pregnancy. The ACLU of Northern California worked hard to secure this right. We continue to use legislative advocacy, public education, litigation and grassroots organizing to protect and advance the rights of all California women to make informed personal decisions about childbearing.
Protecting Privacy, Teen Safety, and Abortion Rights
In the span of four years, California voters three times rejected a ballot initiative that would require doctors to notify a pregnant teen’s parent before an abortion. Propositions 73, Proposition 85 and Proposition 4 all proposed to amend the state Constitution to reverse the state Supreme Court ruling in an ACLU lawsuit that teenagers have fundamental rights to decide whether to end an unintended pregnancy.
The defeat of each of these initiatives shows that Californians continue to care more about the health and safety of our young people than about ideology.
Expanding Prenatal Care for Working Poor Women
Until December 2008, California required that women reside here for six months before they were eligible to receive essential health services through the state’s Access for Infants and Mothers program. The ACLU-NC joined with other public interest organizations to challenge the rule on behalf of Maternal and Child Health Access, a non-profit organization.
The San Francisco Superior Court agreed with our argument that the Constitution protects the right to travel and that states cannot treat newcomers unfairly. The court struck down the requirement, clearing the way for these women to obtain essential prenatal and other medical care they need.
Securing Sex Ed Victories at State and Local Levels
For more than a decade, the ACLU-NC has been working to ensure that sex education in public schools is science-based, free of bias, medically accurate and age-appropriate. The law we co-sponsored with Planned Parenthood in 2004 has become a model for other states and for the national REAL (Responsible Education About Life) Act. After years of Bush Administration support for ineffective, biased and harmful abstinence-only education, the nation is poised to take a new direction, and many are looking to California as a leader.
Despite our significant progress, much remains to be done to implement our legislation and guarantee that students in classrooms across the state are being taught comprehensive sex education. Our strategy is to work both at the school-district level with parent activists and at the state level.
In Fremont Unified School District, we worked intensively for a year with a committed group of parents and community members who sought to remove the federally funded abstinence-only middle school curriculum and replace it with a comprehensive curriculum. Teenagers in Fremont now receive medically accurate information about condoms, sexually transmitted infections and contraception – as well as abstinence.
In Sonoma County, we have asked school districts to comply with state law by replacing abstinence-only sex education with a comprehensive curriculum.
At the state level, we worked cooperatively with the California School Boards Association (CSBA) to develop a more robust model policy regarding sex education for school districts to adopt. Nearly all of California’s 1,000 school districts subscribe to CSBA’s policy service, so by improving CSBA’s model policy, we were able to provide guidance to hundreds of school districts in the state.







Your Health, Your Rights
Sex Education in California Public Schools: Are Students Learning What They Need To Know?


NATIONWIDE
Read more from the National ACLU