![]() |
PRESS RELEASES |
| 2007 | |
| 2006 | |
| 2005 | |
| 2004 | |
| 2003 | |
| 2002 | |
| 2001 | |
| 2000 | |
| 1999 | |
| 1998 | |
| 1997 | |
![]() |
OPINIONS |
![]() |
PUBLICATIONS |
![]() |
PRINT NEWSLETTERS |
![]() |
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT |
![]() |
RSS FEEDS |


“We think this is outrageous. Protestors were engaging in non-violent activity when police arrived not to make arrests but prepared to fire rubber bullets, wooden pellets, and tear gas,” said Mark Schlosberg, Police Practices Policy Director for the ACLU-NC. “There is no justification for this kind of police response that resulted in the serious injury of several protestors and innocent bystanders.”
In the letter, the civil rights groups ask several key questions:
“How
was the police action developed? What was anticipated? Are officers who ordered
the attack going to be disciplined? In these troubled times, what is the Oakland
Police department doing to protect the rights of people engaging in
protest activity and innocent bystanders?”
Under the California Public Records Act and Oakland Sunshine Ordinance, the
civil rights organizations are requesting all police reports, witness
statements, general orders and other documents that will help answer these and
other questions. Under section 2.20.250 of the Sunshine Ordinance the Oakland
Police Department has to respond by the close of business tomorrow.

Download the Winter 2008 ACLU-NC Newsletter and read about our latest events and initiatives.

| • | Public has right to know about police misbehavior |
| • | Police chiefs should support bill |
| • | Injustice came back for Carmona |
