The amended complaint, filed in San Francisco Superior Court, now cites 46 schools where students lack the bare essentials necessary for an education.

One hundred student plaintiffs are represented by the ACLU of Northern and Southern California, Public Advocates, Inc., Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the law firm of Morrison & Foerster and other civil rights groups and cooperating attorneys.

"Since filing the original complaint we have been inundated with calls from parents across the state who are appalled at the conditions in which their children are forced to try to learn," said Michelle Alexander of the ACLU of Northern California. "The problems in these schools are not isolated; they are traceable to the state's abdication of its responsibility to ensure that every child receives the basic minimum necessities as required by the state Constitution."

The new northern California schools cited include San Francisco's Balboa High School; Oakland's Fremont High School, Garfield Elementary, Whittier Elementary and Webster Academy; Watsonville High School; Redwood and Mt. Whitney High Schools in Visalia; Tenaya Middle School in Merced; as well as schools in Cloverdale, Campbell and Berry Creek.

Alondra Sharae Jones, a senior at Balboa, said "I hope this lawsuit will make sure that public school students get the education they deserve. I don't want to see kids having to take responsibility anymore for mistakes that adults have made."

"The conditions under which kids at our school learn remind me of Brown vs. Board of Education all over again," added Balboa High history teacher Alison Dills. "Now, however, the division is not about race so much as socioeconomic status. The education that my students receive is separate, but certainly not equal, to the high schools labeled as high achieving schools."

Science teacher Toai Dao at Oakland's Fremont High School agreed, "We need to give students a fair chance. The state needs to take care of the bare essentials by giving students books and desks and making schools less crowded."

"The worst of these conditions tend to be concentrated in schools populated by California's non-white, non-English speaking, and poor children," charged attorney Thorn Ndaizee Meweh, of Public Advocates, Inc. "Our state Constitution guarantees an equal public education for all California's children. And for good reason: the injury done to a child by poor educational facilities is long-lasting and can haunt their life far into adulthood."

Though the original suit was filed in May, the plaintiffs have still not had an adequate response from the state defendants.

"We remain perplexed by the State's unwillingness to recognize its responsibility to resolve these problems," said Michael Jacobs of Morrison & Foerster, which is working pro bono on the lawsuit. "This amended complaint points to the extent of the problems facing California students trying to learn in substandard conditions."

The plaintiffs are represented by the ACLU affiliates of Northern and Southern California and San Diego, Public Advocates, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, Center for Law in the Public Interest, the Asian Pacific American Legal Center, and MALDEF, as well as cooperating attorneys from Morrison & Foerster, the law firm Newman.Aaronson.Vanaman, Loyola Law School and Georgetown University Law Center.