![]() |
PRESS RELEASES |
| 2009 | |
| 2008 | |
| 2007 | |
| 2006 | |
| 2005 | |
| 2004 | |
| 2003 | |
| 2002 | |
| 2001 | |
| 2000 | |
| 1999 | |
| 1998 | |
| 1997 | |
![]() |
OPINIONS |
![]() |
PUBLICATIONS |
![]() |
PRINT NEWSLETTERS |
![]() |
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT |
![]() |
RSS FEEDS |


The Identity Information Protection Act (SB 768) is authored by Senator Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto). The bill ensures that state-issued ID's, such as a driver’s license, will have adequate privacy and security protections. The bill also guarantees that Californians will be able to decide who and when others can access their personal information.
“RFID technology is not in and of itself the issue. The issue is whether and under what circumstances the government should be allowed to compel its residents to carry technology that broadcasts their most personal information,” said Senator Simitian. “This bill provides a thoughtful and rational policy framework for making those decisions. I hope the Governor agrees."
Since the introduction of SB 768, the legislation has become even more salient as the vulnerabilities of RFID technology have become more public and the potential use of RFID technology in identification documents has become more widespread. In the past year, the security on the RFID-embedded Dutch e-passport and the VeriChip- the RFID chip approved for implantation in humans- were both breached and the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report detailing privacy and security concerns with the use of RFID technology.
The California bill has drawn national attention following the federal government’s decision to embed RFID tags in new U.S. passports. The bill is a model for other states considering the use of RFID tags because it provides safeguards and guidelines on how to protect the privacy rights of individuals.
RFID tags are tiny computer chips that can be embedded in public documents. The danger is that anyone with an RFID scanner can read the personal data stored on the chips. The chips do not alert the person that his or her personal information is being transmitted. The unknown disclosure of that information can put a person at risk of tracking, stalking and identity theft. Last year, more than 39,000 Californians were victims of identity theft and these devices would make that crime even easier to commit.
"Would you allow a stranger to sift through your purse or wallet and take your driver's license? Would you publicly broadcast your personal information to anyone that passes by? Of course not,” said Nicole Ozer, Technology & Civil Liberties Policy Director of the ACLU of Northern California. “That is exactly why the Governor must sign SB 768 into law - to protect Californians from harm to their privacy, financial security, and personal safety.”
SB 768 has wide bi-partisan support from women’s groups, civil rights organizations, domestic violence prevention groups, business organizations, and conservative groups including the Gun Owners of California, Eagle Forum of California, and the Liberty Coalition.
“The privacy and security of Californians is not a liberal or conservative issue, it’s an issue for everyone. The Governor should sign SB 768 into law and protect Californians,” said Sam Paredes, Executive Director of the Gun Owners of California.
The bill was in part inspired by a case of an elementary school in Sutter, California that required its students to wear identification badges that contained RFID tags that transmitted the students' personal information. Parents successfully petitioned the school to remove the RFID tags.
For more information or to write a letter to Governor Schwarzenegger
encouraging him to sign SB 768 click here.