DCSIMG
 
Home > News > Press Releases > U.S. District Court Trial on Access of the Press and Public to Obs...

PRESS CONTACT
REBECCA FARMER
39 DRUMM STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CA 94111
415.621.2493
Email

U.S. District Court Trial on Access of the Press and Public to Observe Executions

San Quentin's Secret Execution Procedures Challenged

For Immediate Release: February 10, 2000

Share This!Share this on FacebookShare this on TwitterForward this to a friend
On February 14th, California First Amendment Coalition v. Calderon will go to trial before U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker. The ACLU-NC argues that journalists and public witnesses have a First Amendment right to witness executions in their entirety and that there is no evidence that media presence jeopardizes prison security or the safety of prison personnel. The trial begins only weeks before California's next execution, scheduled for March 15th.

"It is crucial for public witnesses to see this most irrevocable of governmental acts in its entirety, without the mediation of prison PR people," said Peter Sussman, former president of the plaintiff Society for Professional Journalists, Northern California Chapter. "It's not a role anyone can relish, but it's essential if the citizens of this state are to be kept informed about the awesome powers exercised in their name." The Society for Professional Journalists is a non-profit association of 250 members, including print reporters and writers.

"San Quentin's concerns that execution team members may become targets of retaliation are not based on fact. Since 1938, when the first gas chamber execution was carried out, there has not been any evidence of a security risk or threat against prison staff," said attorney David Fried. "If prison officials are concerned about the security of their staff, there are reasonable steps they can take, including the use of protective surgical garb, or tinting to plastic face shields already used by prison guards."

"Until the 1996 execution of William Bonin, the first in California by lethal injection, the unbroken historical practice was that witnesses to executions, including media witnesses, had an unobstructed view of the inmate from the moment the inmate entered the execution area or chamber," said attorney Michael Kass, of Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP. "It is critical that journalists continue to witness the entire execution and act as the eyes and ears of the public."

The ACLU-NC originally filed the lawsuit on April 9, 1996 after William Bonin became the first person in California to be executed by lethal injection. Reporters and other witnesses to Bonin's execution were prevented by San Quentin prison officials from observing his entry into the chamber, strapping him to the gurney and the attachment of the execution apparatus. Unable to offer first-hand accounts of the entire process, including the difficulties prison officials admitted they encountered in inserting the IVs, the journalists could not thoroughly inform the public on the execution. As a result, the public had to rely solely on prison officials for information about how the death penalty is being implemented by this new method of execution. On May 1 of that year, the U.S. District Court issued a preliminary injunction enjoining prison officials from restricting witness observation of executions.

On February 28, 1997 U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker issued his ruling that public witnesses - including the media - have a constitutionally protected right to observe executions and that there was no evidence that media presence jeopardizes prison security or the safety of prison personnel. The Department of Corrections appealed and in 1998 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. While not denying the existence of a First Amendment right, the Court of Appeals remanded the case to the District Court for a trial regarding whether the restrictive witness procedures are an exaggerated response to prison security concerns.

"Prison officials claim that they intend to pull the curtain if problems occur during the execution, fearing that their actions might be 'misinterpreted by the media,'" said Alan Schlosser, Managing Attorney for the ACLU-NC. "Their desire to present a sanitized view of capital punishment is inconsistent with the First Amendment's guarantee that the public be kept informed of this final act of the criminal justice system."

Plaintiff's witnesses include Jason Beaubien, a former KQED radio reporter who witnessed the Bonin execution and the Keith Daniel Williams execution, and Lonny Jay Shavelson, M.D., an emergency medicine doctor. Dr. Shavelson will testify regarding the use of surgical protective clothing during an execution. The California First Amendment Coalition, a non-profit association of more than 160 California newspapers and TV and radio stations, is also a plaintiff.

In addition to Fried, Kass and Schlosser, attorneys representing the plaintiffs include Jeffrey Ross of Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP and Lynne S. Coffin of the Law Offices of Coffin & Love.




Fall 2011

Download the Fall 2011 ACLU of Northern California Newsletter and read about our latest events and initiatives.
 
Full Newsletter...
Oakland Post
Read former ACLU-NC Executive Director Maya Harris’ column in The Post newspaper, an African-American weekly distributed throughout the San Francisco Bay Area.
Read More »

Life under surveillance pre-World War I to post-9/11. The famous and unsung tell their stories.

Tracked in America is an online documentary.
Visit the site »