Activist Toolkit

This video is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This is part of a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It outlines the legal framework and prosecutorial guidelines for charging individuals under pseudonyms in cases involving sex crimes and other sensitive matters; and cases where Miranda warnings were not required.This video is from October 7, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This document is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This 10-page "Points and Authorities" document accompanies a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It addresses the protocols for issuing Brady alerts under the California Supreme Court decision ALADS v. Supreme Court, and explores the procedural aspects and legal ramifications of Brady disclosures; and text messages as adoptive admissions under the Court of Appeal decision People v. McDaniel. This document is from Sept 3, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This video is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This is part of a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It addresses the protocols for issuing Brady alerts under the California Supreme Court decision ALADS v. Supreme Court, and explores the procedural aspects and legal ramifications of Brady disclosures; and text messages as adoptive admissions under the Court of Appeal decision People v. McDaniel. This video is from Sept 3, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This document is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This 8-page "Points and Authorities" document accompanies a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It focuses on the implications of partial verdicts in criminal trials, specifically discussing the California Supreme Court ruling in People v. Aranda; and evaluating the Court of Appeal decision People v. Morrison and double jeopardy principles. This document is from May 6, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This video is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This is part of a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It focuses on the implications of partial verdicts in criminal trials, specifically discussing the California Supreme Court ruling in People v. Aranda; and evaluating the Court of Appeal decision People v. Morrison and double jeopardy principles. This video is from May 6, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This video is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This is part of a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It focusing on the legal principles surrounding the joinder of defendants in criminal trials and the application of Aranda-Bruton. This video is from April 8, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This document is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This 8-page "Points and Authorities" document accompanies a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It focusing on the legal principles surrounding the joinder of defendants in criminal trials and the application of Aranda-Bruton. This document is from April 8, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This document is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This 8-page "Points and Authorities" document accompanies a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It discussing the California Supreme Court ruling in In re B.M. regarding the use of a butter knife as a deadly weapon and new laws affecting juvenile offenders. This document is from January 7, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This document is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This 8-page "Points and Authorities" document accompanies a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It discusse the California Supreme Court ruling In re B.M. regarding the use of a butter knife as a deadly weapon; and new laws affecting juvenile offenders. This document is from January 7, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.

This video is a training resource from Alameda County authored by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. This is part of a "weekly video surveillance of criminal law" prepared for CLE purposes. It discusse the California Supreme Court ruling In re B.M. regarding the use of a butter knife as a deadly weapon; and new laws affecting juvenile offenders. This video is from January 7, 2019 and was produced by the Alameda County District Attorney's Office on November 3, 2022 in response to a July 23, 2021 PRA request.