San Francisco's Attempt To Ban 28 Individuals from the Tenderloin

Active Case
Apr 22, 2021

In September 2020, the City of San Francisco filed a series of lawsuits against 28 Bay Area residents. The City is seeking to use California’s public nuisance and Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) to ban individuals from the Tenderloin District for allegedly engaging in street-level drug sales. The City, therefore, wants to create a second, civil track, that runs parallel to the existing criminal one.

People targeted by these injunctions can face arrest for merely walking down the street, riding public transport, visiting family members, or seeking any number of supportive services concentrated in the Tenderloin neighborhood.

The ACLU Foundation of Northern California, along with the firms of Swanson & McNamara and DLA Piper, is representing several of the defendants. 

In February 2021, the San Francisco Superior Court denied our motion to strike the City’s request in its complaint for the broad, unconstitutional injunction that would ban our clients from the Tenderloin. Such banishment would impact their right to travel, associate, and engage in free speech, among other harms. The court also declined to grant our demurrer to the complaint, which identified the flawed merits of the City’s public nuisance and UCL claims. 

In March 2021, the City filed for a preliminary injunction against the four defendants whose cases are active. We filed our opposition to this motion on April 12. The court will hear the motion on May 4.  

The overbroad and ineffective nature of the City’s proposed injunctions is highlighted by the fact that the City provides flimsy or no evidence that the defendants facing a preliminary injunction have been convicted of drug sales in the Tenderloin.

Read more:
San Francisco Public Press: Advocates Fire Back at ‘Ineffective’ Drug Dealer Injunctions

The San Francisco Examiner: Advocates call on city attorney to end civil injunctions against 28 alleged drug dealers